IN THE MAIL: Story confuses status of city-owned lots
Published 02/22/2009, Grand Forks
On Feb. 13, the Herald ran a story regarding redevelopment of city-owned vacant lots (“Urban development looks to develop vacant lots for homes,” Page B1). The story contained information regarding two distinctly different redevelopment processes, and I’d like to clarify the status of city-owned lots.Word count: 201
The full article is available to newspaper subscribers. If you are a subscriber please log in to continue reading.