Mike Nowatzki, Published October 22 2013
Judge denies legal challenge to PSC campaign contributionsBISMARCK – A federal judge has ruled against two environmental groups that sought to strip North Dakota of its authority to regulate the coal mining industry because they claimed that campaign contributions to state officials violated federal law.
The Dacotah Chapter of the Sierra Club and the Dakota Resource Council asserted that donations from people affiliated with coal companies to the campaigns of two North Dakota Public Service Commission members violated a conflict-of-interest provision in federal law.
In his ruling filed today, U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Hovland concluded that “the authority to undertake an enforcement action of the state program is discretionary and unreviewable,” and as such, the federal court lacks jurisdiction in the matter.
However, he added in a footnote: “This order should in no manner be construed as an endorsement of the practice of PSC Commissioners accepting campaign contributions from individuals or political action committees closely associated with coal companies and coal mining activities.
“Although the acceptance of campaign contributions from such entities may be lawful … the decision to do so is ill-advised, devoid of common sense, and raises legitimate questions as to the appearance of impropriety,” Hovland wrote.
Hovland heard arguments in August in the case filed in May 2012 by the environmental groups against the U.S. Secretary of the Interior in federal court in Bismarck.
The lawsuit asked the judge to compel Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell to withdraw approval of North Dakota’s surface mining program until it was brought into full compliance with the federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.
The act allows states to assume responsibility for regulating coal mining as long as their regulations are at least as stringent as federal regulations. North Dakota began regulating coal mining operations in the state in 1983.
The Sierra Club claimed that thousands of dollars in campaign contributions to North Dakota Public Service Commissioners Brian Kalk and Kevin Cramer violated the federal act. But Hovland wrote that by providing states the exclusive regulatory control through enforcement of their own approved laws, Congress intended that the federal law establishing minimum standards would “drop out” as the operative law and leave it in the hands of states.
“To construe SMCRA in the manner urged by the Plaintiffs would circumvent the carefully designed balance Congress established between the federal government and the states,” Hovland wrote. “… If the Plaintiffs wished to challenge the enacted state program, the appropriate time for doing so has now long passed.”
Hovland granted summary judgment in favor of Jewell and the PSC, which intervened in the lawsuit and sought to have it dismissed, and denied summary judgment for the Sierra Club.