« Continue Browsing

e-mail article Print     e-mail article E-mail

Danielle Killey, Forum News Service, Published May 07 2013

Minnesota bonding bill stalls with session end near

ST. PAUL – A bill to fund local road and bridge work, flood prevention measures, civic centers and other projects throughout the state appears stalled in the Minnesota Legislature as time runs down on the session.

“We’re getting a little nervous, obviously, because we’re quite close to the end,” House Capital Investment Chairwoman Alice Hausman, DFL-St. Paul, said.

The House and Senate seem to be waiting for each other to move forward on a plan for a so-called bonding bill, where the state would sell bonds to fund public works projects.

Hausman said she is hesitant to put her $800 million bill to a House vote before a Senate plan is released, though she said she might be forced to do so early next week because of a May 20 adjournment deadline.

Senate Capital Investment Chairman LeRoy Stumpf, DFL-Plummer, said his committee is still holding hearings on possible public works funding projects. “I know it seems like we’re getting down to the end, but we still have two weeks,” Stumpf said.

While each chamber develops its own plan, Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, DFL-Cook, said the state constitution requires that the bonding bill be passed first in the House, so it should take the first step.

He also said there needs to be at least some Republican support to move forward.

“We can’t pass it without Republican votes,” Bakk said, because it requires a three-fifths majority to be approved and Democrats do not have that many votes.

Rep. Matt Dean, R-Dellwood, said there may be trouble gathering that support.

It is the wrong year for a major bonding bill, Dean said. He said the Legislature traditionally focuses on the budget one year and puts forward a public works borrowing bill the second of a two-year session. This is a budget year.

“It’s hard to bring up any bonding bill in a non-bonding year, particularly before the budget’s done,” Dean said.

It is not a typical bonding year, Stumpf acknowledged, but said Democrats are trying to make up for smaller bills in the past and requests are mounting.

“There’s a huge, huge desire,” Hausman said. “We’ve always believed that this is the year to be aggressive about bonding.”