TJ Jerke, Forum News Service, Published April 05 2013
Lawmaker calls hearing to review Shirvani fraud allegations
“There’s some very disturbing communications taking place behind the scenes in an effort to discredit the person who was hired to head up the university system,” Rep. Bob Skarphol, R-Tioga, chairman of the House Appropriations education and environment subcommittee, said Friday.
Skarphol said he feels allegations made by a university system employee that Shirvani presented misleading information to his committee was another ploy in a series of attempts to oust Shirvani.
Skarphol said he’s upset at the board members he believes knew that university system employee Linda Baeza Porter was going to make the allegations but did not share that information.
“I’m absolutely angry about it, particularly in regard to board members because they did not inform others on the board, general counsel or compliance officer, but rather let it happen,” he said. “I find that to be unethical and unprofessional.”
Skarphol asked for an open records request for every email from Feb. 28 to early this week between state board member Kari Reichert, board Vice President Kirsten Diederich and Janice Hoffert, a nonvoting board member, along with university system employees Josh Riedy, the University of North Dakota’s chief information officer; and Bill Eggert, the system’s internal auditor.
On March 27, Porter, interim system office liaison officer for reporting and information, said Shirvani presented misleading information to the committee to make two college presidents look bad, using data to compare UND and North Dakota State University to larger schools such as the University of Wisconsin and University of Minnesota to point out disparities rather than making comparisons to more similar-sized schools.
Porter said the presentation, and how it may have been changed, may have been fraudulent and could be a potential violation of state Board of Higher Education policy and state open records and fraud statutes. She asked the House Appropriations Committee to investigate.
Shirvani said last week that UND and NDSU were compared to the larger schools because they are larger, more “aspiring” schools to push the North Dakota universities to increase their graduation rates. Had the schools been compared to similar schools, he said the statistics would have looked worse.
Shirvani said Friday that his reputation has been diminished due to the fraud claim.
“I’m speechless. extremely dismayed and unhappy about the whole chain of events and allegations,” he told the committee.
A 16-minute phone conversation between Porter and Shirvani was played to the committee, which was a conversation over what data should be included in the presentation to the committee. The conversation was recorded without Shirvani’s knowledge.
“You hear anything that sounded fraudulent? Because I don’t,” Skarphol told the committee. “I hear someone in charge of an entity who gets frustrated with an employee because there seems to be a dilemma with this information.”
The dilemma was what information needed to be included in the presentation and the extra time it took to validate. Shirvani said the information did not need validation because it came from a federal government website.
Reichert, who took the brunt of the questioning from Skarphol, said she looked into the data discrepancy after Porter raised concerns to her before the March 27 meeting. Reichert said Friday that she wasn’t comfortable watching the university system look up graduation rate data and not inform the college presidents that it was going to be made available to the committee.
“The larger concern I felt was the presidents were going to be blindsided,” she said.
She added that she felt the presentation “was part of an effort to show inconsistencies” between North Dakota schools and larger universities.
Porter was not at Friday’s meeting, which adjourned without a conclusion or any action taken by the committee. Skarphol said he will continue to go through the emails but doesn’t plan to call another hearing.
Have a comment to share about a story? Letters to the editor should include author’s name, address and phone number. Generally, letters should be no longer than 250 words. All letters are subject to editing. Send a letter to the editor.