« Continue Browsing

e-mail article Print     e-mail article E-mail

Don Davis, Forum News Service, Published May 29 2012

Coalition targets Minnesota farming pollution

ST. PAUL – Minnesota city and conservation leaders say farmers contribute most of the pollution to state waters but do too little to prevent the damage or fix it.

They told reporters Tuesday that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency needs to take action by ordering farmers to lower their pollution contribution.

“It is not fair when only the city residents pay the bills,” said Alexandria Mayor Dan Ness, president of the League of Minnesota Cities.

MPCA officials said they cannot order farmers to stop polluting and are in the middle of working out cleanup plans. A farm leader decried what he called “finger-pointing” by city officials and conservation leaders.

President Doug Peterson of the Minnesota Farmers’ Union said, “You can’t wave your hand” and farm pollution automatically disappears.

“It still is going to take some time to have a menu in place, and it still has to go through the legislative process,” he said.

MPCA officials said they already are in the process of deciding what should be done to clean the state’s waters and that taking action before having all the facts would be premature.

Also, the Dayton administration and federal officials are working on a program to provide financial incentives for farmers to increase conservation practices, and thus decrease run-off pollution.

But the city-conservationist coalition said action is needed now, and put down the state-federal program as voluntary.

"We have been trying voluntary practices since the Dust Bowl," Whitney Clark, of Friends of the Mississippi River, said. "People do the things you require them to do; they don't do things you ask they nicely to do." A news release said farmers need to "be accountable for cleaning up their share of run-off pollution."

While the release did not list specific actions they want the state to take, Clark did say that farmers should be required to improve their conservation practices, such as adding buffer strips of plants near water to reduce pollution.

Ness used an example from the southern Twin Cities, saying cities there must pay $1 billion to clean up the Mississippi and Minnesota rivers in their areas.

Clark said farmers contribute 13 times more pollution to Minnesota waters than cities do.

“This is Minnesota’s moment of truth,” he said.

Gaylen Reetz, director of the MPCA’s Watershed Division, said plans to clean up the state’s 81 major watersheds should be ready by 2018. However, he added, if there are no legal roadblocks, plans to clean up some south Twin Cities water should be ready in a year.

Reetz said the situation must be studied so officials can draw up plans that work. He said there are many variables from watershed to watershed, so one plan will not work statewide.

Peterson said the requirements that cities and conservationists want could drive up prices on most goods. It also could force small farmers to sell to larger operations, he said.

“They don’t see the larger picture of costs involved,” Peterson said. “That is what is so sad to me.”

Announcements like the one city officials and conservation groups made Tuesday cause divisiveness, Peterson said, which does not help to solve the problem.

Don Davis reports for Forum Communications Co.

Have a comment to share about a story? Letters to the editor should include author’s name, address and phone number. Generally, letters should be no longer than 250 words. All letters are subject to editing. Send a letter to the editor.